The legislation applies to British ships proceeding - whether from Hong Kong - on a voyage of seven days duration; and it empowers the Governor of Hong Kong to declare whether a specific voyage comes within its provisions.
A voyage of seven days was evidently considered a "sea voyage", within the ordinary acceptation of the term, for which the prescribed precautions ought to be enforced. The duration of the voyage is clearly of the essence of the question. Yet the schedule of an Act of the Hong Kong Legislature, in 1874, provides that this may be ascertained not by fact and experience, but by assuming that a steamer can travel five miles an hour without sails.
The basis of calculation seems absurd; permitting what is really a three and a half days' voyage for an ordinary steamer to be declared a seven days' voyage; and so necessitating the provision of appliances and the exercise of restrictions which would practically disqualify, on a false assumption, ships perfectly well adapted to different conditions.
For voyages of 7 days' duration are practically unknown in the China Coast trade. It is rare for a run to exceed three and a half days. The duration is more frequently two to three, as the several steamers call usually at each treaty port on their way; and there are seven such ports on the 1,300 miles of coast between Hong Kong and Newchwang.
The new Legislation would practically abolish considerations of duration, and subject ships that are rarely more than 48 hours without entering port, to conditions properly intended for a long sea voyage. It may be plausibly alleged that the new Ordinance shall not be put in force unless the assent of all Powers be obtained to its provisions. But it may be replied, without hesitation, that such assent could not be made operative even if it were given.
Page 2
7
:
ל :
.I
08
340
!...
...i smo200
Delrin .
ad tund eval
Bonoli Ja
applies to British ships proceeding
-
whether from Hong Kong
-
on a voyage of seven days
R
or the Treaty Ports of China
duration; and it empowers the Governor of Hong Kong to
declare whether a specific voyage come within its provisions.
A voyage of seven days was evidently considered a Bea
voyage", within the ordinary acceptation of the term, for which
the prescribed precautions ought to be enforced. The duration
of the voyage is clearly of the essence of the question, Yet
the schedule of an Act of the Hong Kong Legislature, in 1874,
provides that this may be ascertained not by fact and experi-
ence, but by assuming that a steamer can travol five miles an
hour without sails.
The basis of calculation seems absurd; permitting what
is really a three and a half days' voyage for an ordinary
steamer to be declared a seven days voyage; and so necessital -
ing the provision of appliances and the exercise of restric-
tions which would practically disqualify, on a false assumption,
ships perfectly well adapted to different conditions. For
voyages of 7 days duration are practically unknown in the China
Coast trade. It is rare for a run to exceea three and a half
days. The duration is more frequently two to three, as the
szvzval steamers call usually at euch treaty ports on their way; and
there are seven such parts on the 1,300 miles of coast between
Hong Kong and Newchwang .
The new Legislation would practically abolish considera-
tions of duration, and subject ships that are rarely more than
48 hours without entering port, to cunditions properly intended
for a long sea voyage. It may be plausibly alleged that the
new Ordinance shall not be put in force unless the assent of
all Powers be obtained to its provisions, But it may be re-
plied, without hesitation, that such assent could not be made
operative even if it were given.
2
7
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.